Original Software News
If something important on your car needs fixing, you do it. You don’t really have a choice because you need your car. It’s the same with your ERP platform, but often senior management don’t look at the details of how you do it, the internal cost of doing it or the fact that the process might be less than ideal with unnecessary risk of failure. It’s been a long time since I’ve done any car maintenance and whilst it might be a lot cheaper for me to do somethings the risk is too great.
Persuading senior management to invest in technology to improve, reduce cost and de-risk should be easy, but in reality, it often takes a good deal of selling.
There are a number of areas in the cycle of managing ERP upgrades where technology can a play a big part, but very often these are not seriously considered because: –
Testing tools are usually in the domain of IT.
The tools on the market are not appropriate for non-technical users.
IT does not need to worry about testing the ERP, that’s th
In the ERP world, whether on-premise, private cloud or SaaS cloud the impact of any change is not as clear or easily understood as it might have been in a home-grown application. The risk is magnified because a third party is making changes to an expensive system, which is critical for running the business, providing changes that we probably did not ask for, that we don’t understand, that may impact other integrated systems and that might have hidden features which can bring business to a standstill.
So, whereas before we relied on quality being determined by effectiveness and good practice across a number of stages in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), the responsibility for quality “Shifts Right” exclusively to the function of testing. At the same time, the testing team may have been reduced, or more probably the emphasis placed on the business in User Acceptance Testing, that is even further “Right”.
The business users of course are best placed to spot the unwanted features and issues having the best knowledge of how the processes work, but they are not professional testers, they don’t think like testers and are not likely to carry out the most effective quality assurance process. Not without help anyway. Do they get that help? Help in the form of planning, management, analysis, training and technology? The answer is likely to be at best; “partially”.
One of the reasons for buying an ERP style application (typically at vast cost) is the avoidance of the development effort that goes with designing, building and maintaining home-built applications. There is also potential for fewer staff in all roles such as Business Analysts, Systems Architects, Programmers and Testers. This on-going cost reduction and the added benefit of a readily available flow of the latest market-led features means you will have a modern, bug free, up to date platform to support current and future business needs, at a fraction of the cost of the old system. For these reasons, the painful price tag becomes acceptable and the ROI case a matter for the accountants and crystal-ball gazers.
The reality may turn out to be a little different to this enticing vision, particularly when considering the effort, and associated cost involved to move to this new world. When looking back it may transpire that the investment made has ended up being greater than anticipated. That is not to say that it is not worthwhile, but just more costly, possibly considerably more costly, than was expected. The result is that the new ERP, and this includes upgrades or migrations not just new installs, is now of even greater financial significance because of this major investment.
By Sara Ponsford, Head of Product Management
At Original Software we endeavour to provide the most comprehensive support possible for your environments, often above and beyond that provided by their suppliers. As such we have continued to support Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 for more than a year beyond even the Extended Support provided by Microsoft.
However, with the introduction of Windows 10 in July and the incompatibilities between new and old Operating Systems, Windows XP and Windows 2003 can no longer be supported by us.
Original software is excited to announce that our organization has been selected as a Finalist for the 2014 Grocer Gold Awards in the “Technology Supplier of the Year” category, which recognizes the company whose innovation in 2013 has most meaningfully boosted the sales, profitability, effectiveness and/or reputation of a grocery/fast-moving consumer goods retailer or supplier.
Our company is being recognized for outstanding work with Midcounties Co-operative, the best performing company within the Co-op Group, and Marston’s, the UK’s largest independent brewer.
We helped Midcounties Co-operative improve the quality and speed-to-market of their customer-facing software and reduced the time and cost of ensuring a high-quality, low-risk SAP upgrade for Marston’s.
On June 21st, CKC Seminars organised the second edition of Test Automation Day.
A very successful conference day with more than 180 enthusiastic Test Automation professionals!
The keynote presentation by Scott Barber answered the question “The Future is Cool, but Does it Add Value?”, whilst Walter Belger presented the ins and out of Security Testing.
Software failures are costing companies significant amounts of money and damage to their brand, people are losing jobs and in some cases their liberty because of avoidable software failures!
Times are tough. You know it, I know it, your competition knows it and your boss definitely knows it.
Every Tester in Testville liked testing a lot.
But the Grinch, who sat north of Development – did not.
The Grinch was a Tester and he hated the whole damn lot!
Would you like to join us for breakfast and enjoy an informative look at software testing?
Keeping up with the latest trends in software testing can be time consuming, especially when you’re trying to get a new release out the door! So why not join your fellow QA professionals for breakfast, where you’ll have the opportunity to discuss the following and more:
• Is there a smarter way to test manually?